Current:Home > NewsCitizens-only voting, photo ID and income tax changes could become NC amendments on 2024 ballots -FutureFinance
Citizens-only voting, photo ID and income tax changes could become NC amendments on 2024 ballots
View
Date:2025-04-23 10:12:35
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — The North Carolina Senate is considering a slew of elections-related measures including three proposed constitutional amendments designed to give voters a say in the law-making process.
GOP senators are trying to advance the legislation quickly as an indefinite recess looms over the North Carolina General Assembly due to rocky budget negotiations. The bills — which passed a Senate elections committee on Thursday — deal with artificial intelligence in political advertisements, absentee ballot challenges and signature verification — as well as the three amendment proposals that could appear on ballots this fall.
“The opportunity before you today is to empower the people of North Carolina to amend their own state constitution,” Gaston County Republican Sen. Brad Overcash said in committee.
The proposed constitutional amendments would cover citizens-only voting, voter ID laws and income taxes. If the amendment projects are successfully enacted by the legislature, voters can cast their ballot for or against the referendums in November, making them law with a simple majority of votes.
To get a question on the ballot, it requires supermajorities — 72 House and 30 Senate members — to pass it. Referendums are not subject to Gov. Roy Cooper’s veto.
The first amendment — which also was proposed by House Republicans earlier this month — clarifies that only U.S. citizens who are at least 18 years old and meet other qualifications “shall be entitled to vote at any election.” The Constitution originally stated that everyone who is born in the U.S. or was naturalized as a citizen can vote.
It is already illegal for noncitizens to vote in U.S. elections, and the amendment does not appear to change any laws in practice. But the bill’s proponents say the clarifying language would set a foundation for who is eligible to vote and avoid confusion.
The second amendment states that all types of voting in North Carolina require photo identification, whereas the state constitution previously only specified in-person voting. Similarly to the citizens-only voting, photo ID is already required for all voting types in the state.
The last amendment would set a cap on income taxes at 5% rather than the current 7%. Individual and corporate income tax rates both are below 5% in the state.
The photo voter ID and income tax cap amendments — which required photo ID to vote in person and to lower the income tax cap from 10% to 7% — were already approved by voters in November 2018, but are still being challenged in court by the state NAACP. Senate leader Phil Berger suggested this week that getting voters to make changes to these amendments in November could make the litigation moot.
House Speaker Tim Moore, a primary sponsor of a House version of the citizens-only referendum bill, told reporters on Thursday he supported the voter ID proposal but had not yet reviewed the income tax question.
Outside of potential referendums, the Senate is also eyeing changes to political advertising laws, ballot challenge procedures and signature verification. The bill’s provisions include the following:
1. Require the use of generative AI to be disclosed in political advertisements and outline that a violation would result in a misdemeanor
2. Mandate county election boards to challenge early voting or absentee ballots cast if the person is deemed ineligible because of death or a felony record
3. Implement signature verification software for absentee ballots across the state starting July 2025
Democratic senators raised several concerns with the legislation, such as the reliability of signature verification by machines and the AI disclosure. Mecklenburg Democratic Sen. Natasha Marcus said the bill doesn’t do enough to stop politicians from using AI for “nefarious” reasons.
Burke County Republican Sen. Warren Daniel responded to Marcus’ concern by telling her to provide an amendment for consideration.
veryGood! (56)
Related
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Another Rising Cost of Climate Change: PG&E’s Blackouts to Prevent Wildfires
- Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Targeted for Drilling in Senate Budget Plan
- Today is 2023's Summer Solstice. Here's what to know about the official start of summer
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Keystone Oil Pipeline Spills 210,000 Gallons as Nebraska Weighs XL Decision
- Hurry to Coach Outlet to Shop This $188 Shoulder Bag for Just $66
- Father's Day 2023 Gift Guide: The 11 Must-Haves for Every Kind of Dad
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- WHO ends global health emergency declaration for COVID-19
Ranking
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Toddlers and Tiaras' Eden Wood Is All Grown Up Graduating High School As Valedictorian
- Coal Miner Wins Black Lung Benefits After 14 Years, Then U.S. Government Bills Him
- What does the end of the COVID emergency mean to you? Here's what Kenyans told us
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- Walmart will dim store light weekly for those with sensory disabilities
- Montana House votes to formally punish transgender lawmaker, Rep. Zooey Zephyr
- Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Targeted for Drilling in Senate Budget Plan
Recommendation
Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
Harvard Study Finds Exxon Misled Public about Climate Change
Major psychologists' group warns of social media's potential harm to kids
Deciding when it's time to end therapy
IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
More gay and bisexual men will now be able to donate blood under finalized FDA rules
Diet culture can hurt kids. This author advises parents to reclaim the word 'fat'
These states are narrowly defining who is 'female' and 'male' in law